How much for a pay raise?

Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Text Size: A | A

Gov. Andrew Cuomo has proven adept at getting the Legislature to do what he wants, whether it’s a tax cap, ethics reform or same-sex marriage. We’d like his chances with a minimum-wage increase, reform of New York City’s stop-and-frisk laws and decriminalization of small amounts of marijuana, too. There’s no need to link them to a legislative pay raise, as he wants to do.

The idea of such a raise is very unpopular with New Yorkers (75 percent are against), and for good reason: a $79,500 base salary, plus $171 for expenses each day they are in session, plus lulus for leadership positions, plus health care and pension benefits is adequate compensation for part-time legislators, especially during tough economic times like these when so many of their constituents are without pay raises, benefits or even jobs. Even though they’ve had no increase since 1999, our state lawmakers’ base pay is still third highest in the nation, behind only California’s and Pennsylvania’s.

While the legislative leaders and many members have made clear they would like a raise, they know there would be backlash at the polls and so will wait until after the election. Then they must act before Dec. 31 (because a sitting Legislature can’t increase its own pay) or wait another two years.

Meanwhile, Cuomo is helping them by getting people used to the idea, saying he’s open to a legislative pay raise but only if lawmakers first do “the public’s business.” In other words, a quid pro quo, a pay raise in return for something else. That’s politics, and despite our opposition to a pay raise, we (and, we suspect, many New Yorkers) could hold our nose and go for one provided Cuomo got enough in return.

But a hike in the minimum wage and small changes in the marijuana laws aren’t nearly enough. If legislators’ pay is going to be raised to $100,000 or more, as expected, some major reforms have to be made to improve our political system, save taxpayers money and keep struggling local governments from going bankrupt.

How about public financing of political campaigns, with matching funds? How about serious mandate relief for local governments, including elimination of the Triborough Amendment, which guarantees scheduled raises to public employees even after contracts expire? That’s the kind of deal that would enhance Cuomo’s reputation, rather than damage it.

Share story: print print email email facebook facebook reddit reddit


October 23, 2012
8:24 a.m.
jimsquest says...

Is this article satire? You start the article by saying the legislators are overpaid with overly generous benefits to what amounts to a part time job. You then imply that a pay raise would be justified if the Triborough Amendment is repealed.

So you have no problem rewarding upper income legislators if they destroy the bargaining rights of middle class workers?

The Schenectady Gazette prides itself on being the only locally owned newspaper in the Capital region, but after reading this article, perhaps you should consider moving to Wisconsin. Scott Walker would love your anti-middle class, anti-union viewpoints.

October 24, 2012
8 p.m.
robbump says...

Our legislators deserve NO RAISE!

Every few years, they come to us asking ... no, BEGGING to "work for us", all the while knowing darn well what the pay is. They make careers of the duty and privilege that our founders designed to be only temporary and almost-volunteer duty to the citizens.

I would say to give them all the perks of an E-5 enlisted person; but with no pensions. Give them taxpayer-funded barracks and a mess hall and take away their per diem.

Most of their "work" has become self-serving, instead of public service. They all know where the door is: use it!

Log-in to post a comment.

columnists & blogs

Log into

Forgot Password?