Weatherization is money well spent

Monday, February 4, 2013
Text Size: A | A

As real as the global warming phenomenon is, most homeowners would be hard-pressed to tell by looking at their monthly heating bills. Especially those living in upstate New York at this time of year.

New Yorkers pay roughly $2,400 to heat their homes every winter, which is about one-third more than the national average. Those who take steps to weatherize their homes pay a lot less — very close to the $1,800-a-year national average, in fact — so doing things like insulating, weatherstripping and caulking, and buying high-efficiency heating systems makes a lot of sense because the energy savings pay for the improvements in just a few years.

Unfortunately, the cost of these improvements is still beyond the reach of many low- and middle-income New Yorkers, and the federal program that provides help for them has been cut dramatically the past couple of years. Consequently, thousands of New Yorkers who are on waiting lists for assistance are being forced to spend hundreds more dollars heating their homes than they need to. It’s a terrible waste of money.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand realizes this and has been stumping around the state with various members of New York’s congressional delegation in an effort to drum up support for a boost to the program. (She’s asking President Obama to more than double the program’s current funding level, to $210 million.)

It’s going to be a tough sell in Washington, what with deficit reduction seemingly the order of the day, but sometimes spending money makes sense when it saves money. And in this case, it does: roughly $2.50 for every dollar spent.

Perhaps deficit-conscious lawmakers would be more amenable to bolstering the program if it were modified to reach more people, though with less-generous benefits at the upper end. The income limit is $49,332 for a family of four, which isn’t unreasonable; but a sliding scale that provided smaller benefits above, say, $40,000 would help stretch program dollars.

It’s nice that the program pays 100 percent of the improvements’ costs, but it does seem a bit rich for families that are essentially at the national median income level.

Share story: print print email email facebook facebook reddit reddit


February 4, 2013
10:56 a.m.
newyorker65 says...

Instead of handing them cash to offset their heating bills, why not send someone over with all the materials needed to weatherproof their homes? I'm sure the cost would be minimal compared to all the money just handed to them every year! And they would be learning how to take care of their own home/apartment instead of relying on another government handout. The government could reimburse them for the materials needed every year... or hand out the materials as needed from a centralized location. I'm surprised that the annual cost for heating a home for the winter is $2,400! That seems excessive, but then people MUST have these mammoth homes with cathedral ceilings! I have a modest 3 bedroom home that costs me less than half what you are saying is the average cost. I admit that I don't weatherproof my home, and I should and will probably do it next winter, but still, my cost is quite low in comparison.

February 5, 2013
6:39 a.m.
safny says...

The program helps with the wetherization, not the bills. There are programs at NYSERDA and also tax credits.

February 5, 2013
11:51 a.m.
newyorker65 says...

safny... It is my understanding that the program helps pay their heating bills. I've inquired into this program and have not found where they are given the weatherization materials, but maybe if they were taught, or given the materials, they could lower their bills so they wouldn't have to depend on the government to pay them. I'm happy to help people, but not to just hand them money.

February 6, 2013
6:29 p.m.
albright1 says...

Government handout programs for residential and commercial energy efficiency projects started about 1975. So we have been doing this for over 35 years. You would think we would have covered all the old structures by now. One thing is for sure, the bureaucracy that hands out the money and the "middle man" recipients are firmly established. So don't expect to get a good value for the hand out dollars.

Log-in to post a comment.

columnists & blogs

Log into

Forgot Password?