Push coming to shove over school aid

Thursday, February 14, 2013
Text Size: A | A

In case you hadn’t noticed, there’s a showdown looming between public school educators and their constituents on one side, and overburdened New York taxpayers on the other: a nasty showdown over — what else? — money.

After two years of having to comply with Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s 2 percent property tax cap — which, as many taxpayers know often is higher — education bureaucrats are chomping at the bit. Even relatively wealthy ones like Niskayuna, which had to cut to the bone last year, are in worse shape this year — facing a modest increase in regular state aid, less “gap elimination aid,” higher payroll and pension costs, and no way to raise the money needed to close their projected deficits.

Then there are the low-income districts, like Schenectady, which closed schools, fired guidance counselors and librarians and cut educational programs to deal with last year’s deficit. This year, they’re putting on a full-court press for an overhaul of the way the state doles out aid to schools: The formula the state was supposed to have followed the past half-dozen years has been roundly ignored, and poor districts like Schenectady’s have been getting seriously shortchanged.

Monday’s newspaper featured a story about a bill sponsored by Assemblywoman Donna Lupardo that would drastically alter the aid formula so that districts like Schenectady would get enormous increases while rich ones like Rye would gradually get zeroed out. Lupardo acknowledges that her bill has no chance of passing; even lawmakers that represent poor districts, like freshman Assemblyman Phil Steck, realize it is a political nonstarter.

Among other reasons, state legislators often have constituents in more than one school district, and they have to reconcile the differences between their respective interests. And even in relatively rich districts (like Niskayuna), most taxpayers think they’re overburdened; they wouldn’t look kindly on the state cutting their aid back dramatically or eliminating it.

Nor should the state do so. What it does need to do is figure out a better way to raise the money needed for education; reduce costly mandates (like special education) on school districts; and stop grandstanding with gimmicks like STAR and the tax cap.

Share story: print print email email facebook facebook reddit reddit


February 14, 2013
7:23 a.m.
wmarincic says...

NY the highest paid districts in the country and the worse graduation rate, so again the Gazette is wrong, the Headline should have read "YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY THE UNIONS FOR".

February 14, 2013
3:13 p.m.
birmy says...

Niskayuna has the #1 school district in the area as ranked by Capital District Business Review. I believe Niskayuna has faced 4 straight years of state aid decreases as opposed to what the article said - "modest decreases." Why do suburban schools do so well compared to some city schools? Is that the Union's fault too?

February 15, 2013
8:25 a.m.
tonijean613 says...

Poverty is why Schenectady schools don't do well. I think Schdy and Nisky should collaborate and run a Grand National Experiment - combine a rich district with a poor district- bus 1/2 of the rich kids to Schdy High, bus 1/2 of poor kids to Nisky-
See how fast both schools would improve, and see how fast Schenectady turns into an urban city people will want to flock to. We need to stop the huge economic and social divide.

February 16, 2013
9:50 a.m.
Phils2008 says...

Money will not and can not improve kids education. Another fallacy driven leftwing philosophy. Most of the money they continue to pilfer from homeowners simply goes into teachers pockets or into synthetic fields for football. The real problem is the cultural changes inflicted on society by the left and the media in this country. The home environment has been destroyed by both. There no longer exists a home and family structure conducive to learning. No respect for authority in or out of school. All the money in the world can not fix that now. Once the left told little Johnny he had rights the parents authority ended. Hillary's "it takes a village" really just meant the collective left needs to continue indoctrination not education. Teachers should not get one dime more until they focus on real education and drop the left wing cultural brain washing.

Log-in to post a comment.

columnists & blogs

Log into

Forgot Password?