The Daily Gazette
The Locally Owned Voice of the Capital Region
Advertisement
Promotions

Op-ed column

Don’t stretch intent of 14th Amendment; let the states decide

Debating same-sex marriage, part 1

  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • LINKEDIN
  • PRINT
  • E-MAIL
Text Size: A | A

In the case of Hollingsworth vs. Perry, argued Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to declare same-sex marriage a right in all 50 states. It should not. Twice same-sex marriage has been on the ballot in Washington state — in 2009 for the substance and in 2012 for the name — and twice I voted for it. I’m still for it, but I’m for the states deciding it on their own time. Washington ...


You Must Log-In or Subscribe to Continue Subscription Offer Individual stories can be found and purchased from our Archives for $2.00

Advertisement

comments

Newsworthy
March 31, 2013
9:44 p.m.

[ Flag Post ]

I disagree with Bruce, in that no one - states included - should have the right to decide who can be married. The court should affirm the right of all American citizens to choose a person to marry. Same-gender (not sex) marriages don't harm anyone. They do offend people - too bad. We all do things that offend others and take offense in the actions of others; that does not give any of us the right to decide the behavior of others when it causes no actual harm. The specific intent of the Constitution is to guarantee rights to all citizens equally, without religious bias.

Advertisement