The Daily Gazette - Schenectady, NY
Daily Gazette

Editorial: What sidewalks were those people walking on?!
Monday, March 31, 2008

Text Size: A | A | A

We can’t help but wonder just where those people assigned to judge the walkability of the city of Schenectady went to reach their conclusion that the city is among the most 100 walkable in America. Was this some kind of a joke?

While Schenectady has several decent parks and plenty of interesting neighborhoods and commercial areas — some of the key criteria reportedly used by the American Podiatric Medical Association and Prevention.com — the city’s sidewalks are a mess.

There’s so much heaved and broken pavement; asphalt spread atop concrete; and, during the (long) winters, snow and ice, that getting anywhere on Schenectady’s sidewalks is almost always a challenge. For someone in a wheelchair, or pushing a baby carriage, it’s hard to imagine its being anything but impossible.

Slowly but surely, the city has been redoing its sidewalks — an expensive proposition, to be sure — but this has typically been done in conjunction with the street-paving program rather than according to need. At the rate the city has been progressing, though, it will be decades before there’s a noticeable impact on the problem.

While sidewalks are public property, it is the adjacent property owner’s legal obligation to see that they’re passable. The city simply doesn’t bother enforcing this law — few cities do — whether for broken pavement or snow and ice.

If it wants to be a truly walkable city — which would be wonderful — it needs to do a better job policing the condition of its sidewalks. Force the owners of the worst offenders to make the necessary repairs or do the necessary shoveling. Assist them, if necessary, with programs that provide labor if the owner pays for materials. Sidewalk improvement should be no less of a priority for the city as finishing the bike-hike path.



Share story:   print   email +digg
+fark
+reddit
+facebook
+del.icio.us
+stumbleupon

comments


March 31, 2008
7:11 a.m.

[ Suggest removal ]
gplante ( no real name given ) says...

I couldn't agree more! However, the survey you mention does note that a walkable city is one in which walking to a store, park, etc is an advantage in a walkable city compared to a non-walkable one. Sidewalks or type thereof weren't mentioned. It's been almost a dozen years that Councilman Joe Allen of the city's council mentioned a sidewalk program, of course, it went nowhere. We, here in the Stockade, because of the Walkabout, Art Show and Annual Sidewalk Sale have a crisis in walking the sidewalks. I overheard a woman last year during the Walkabout say that; "for a walkabout I had to walk in the roads. The sidewalks are impassable". There was an idea floated to have a program for anyone who fixed their own sidewalks would get a cash grant to help out. Obviously, it never got off the ground realizing just how expensive it could be to run. The asphalt pouring over concrete is an ingorant way to cover over concretes' broken sidewalks, etc. Hence, the buckling of the asphalt. However, that is not allowed in the city any longer. I'm still wondering why each county legislator can't/won't or haven't thought about getting $5 thousand dollars per year for each neighborhood they represent and start, block-by-block to finally get a decent sidewalk program going. Grants, etc are available. Eg.: The Main Street program allows for such. Hey, anything is a start compared to 12 years talking about it and not getting results. I believe we can do better. Sidewalks should reign in a "walkable" city.

Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)

In Today's Gazette...
October 11, 2008

Poll
Was O.J. Simpson rightfully convicted of kidnapping and armed robbery charges?



See the results


Services



Gazette Election coverage

Gazette Stockadathon

Saratoga Showcase of Homes

Ask A Doctor