Comments by ChuckD
Posted on August 24 at 12:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ms. Clinton doesn't want to "abolish all guns" and Australia did not. If you want to be taken seriously you should choose less hysterical words.
Posted on August 23 at 11:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
A. Regardless whether it's true all those names are Trump supporters (and it's not true), here on Earth thousands of White supremacists, White nationalists and Neo-Nazis have openly declared their Trump love.
B. You clearly don't understand the definition of "bigoted".
Good luck in November!
Posted on August 22 at 9:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Right. Trump is heaven-sent.
Thousands of White supremacists can't be wrong!
Posted on August 22 at 9:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Snopes reports they were captured on security video writing the message and have been banned from the place. That took a 24 second search to find out.
Posted on August 22 at 9:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Don't forget the train!
Posted on August 21 at 2:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thank you Rich, for that well-reasoned clarification.
Me, I'm just another nut in the gallery here who is admittedly cynical on the energy industry yet still has to pay a convoluted bill every month (and off-the-grid is not an option for me right now).
Posted on August 20 at 11:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Mr. Felak, multiple financial news sources report that the US has given over US$550 billion annually to the fossil fuel industry. That, to me, is a catastrophic failure in our leadership.
Your initial premise seems to be 'we need to keep these renewables in check, now!'. And I do agree with your final point.
My point is, you're stepping over dollars for pennies in not using your limited word count to address the whole picture, and in my mind I wonder why. Especially since you didn't disclose your affiliation with NYISO.
Posted on August 20 at 1:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
charles, for your preferred search engine: government fossil fuel subsidies
Why do so many like Mr. Felak not want to move our country in the right direction?
Posted on August 20 at 1:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The "theory" of “last clear chance” sounds to this non-lawyer more like "why weren't you more of a hero", or "why didn't you pull off a miracle".
The optics of it alone are disgusting, but I guess I have a lesser stomach than a lawyer.
This man-child should be committed by the court to, for the rest of his life, pay a majority of his income to the two estates and his prison sentence should force him to perform work to do so.
Posted on August 18 at 7:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
biwemple, that's just the start of what's wrong there.
Heading eastbound, who thought up the idea of putting the northbound I-87 ramp (an instinctively leftward change of direction) rightmost at a very busy toll plaza? I'm thinking it was the parents of those now forcing traffic circles everywhere.