Comments by FrankLowe
Posted on March 24 at 6:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Mr Guido, Does yout "racist" Republicans club include Senator Tim Scott, Congresswoman Mia Love, or Dr Ben Carson?
And while we're on the subject of race, since Obama is half cauacasian, how do we know that these so called haters don't dislike his white half ?
Posted on March 22 at 12:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Safny, While the administration of many of these handouts is a function of the county, they are underwritten by state and federal funds, hence my criticism of state and federal office holders.
Dollar wise, I couldn't agree with you more about medicaid fraud.
And for the record, I despise the Republican party, as much as the Democrat party, not only in Albany, but nationwide.
Posted on March 22 at 11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It's O.K. to ask Muggy, but you'll never get a straight answer. The Obamas, Cuomos, and Tonkos of the world have enabled those who choose to live off the labor of others, therefore building their constituency. The above mentioned 3 stooges would never be elected if the truth were told.
Posted on March 15 at 3:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The author acts like this is a first. Teachers unions have been exploiting kids since their inception. "Give teachers a raise or you hate kids" "Vote yes for your school budget or you hate kids" "Anyone who complains about wasteful public education spending and overpaid under worked teachers hates kids" etc. etc. etc.
Posted on March 14 at 9:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Albright1, I'll answer your question. The Global Warming hoaxsters ran out of feeble minded local adults who'll buy into their nonsense, so they had go 186 miles east and find a youngster whose parents probably are academics.
Posted on March 7 at 6:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Great piece Mr Smith, but you're wasting your words trying preach common sense and truth to those who are unhinged.
Posted on March 6 at 11:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Mr Lo Piccolo,
Since you don't quite understand the freedom of speech thing, I'll spell it out for you in simple terms. Non offensive speech doesn't need to be protected. Somewhere, somehow, someone will be offended by something you say, therefore, all speech is sacred and should remain free of any and all restrictions.
And, by the way, the savage animals who attacked Charlie Hebdo would just as soon kill you and your family as look at you, no matter how non offensive your words are to them.
Je Suis Charlie
Posted on February 1 at 6:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Most "potential" voters know more about deflated footballs and the Kardashans rear ends than they know about their elected representatives. And the politicians like it that way.
Posted on January 23 at 8:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Great editorial, I couldn't have said better myself. Perhaps those still supporting Silver have something to hide. If Silver squeals to save his own hide, perhaps many more of his supporters will also find themselves on the wrong side of the law.
More than likely this will turn into a long drawn out circus like the Bruno trial, and the end result will be a big bill to the taxpayers with no punishment.
Bruno and Silver(along with many others) should be sharing a prison cell for the rest of their lives.
Posted on January 23 at 8 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Excellent points Mr Morrill. It's refreshing to see a young person who's engaged and well informed. I hope the ministers of propaganda in your school system don't use their twisted logic to try to censor you.