Comments by JIMOCONNOR
Posted on October 3 at 11:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
These 3 comments reinforce the need for this issue to be addressed as part of a well rounded preparation for adult and professional life.
Posted on September 29 at 4:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Avoid gathering in APALACHIN
Posted on September 24 at 9:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Do you actually know this young person? There is a school of thought which encourages ''de-energizing'' trauma by encouraging discussion of, and re-enacting the event in safe environs.
Posted on September 23 at 11:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
how will these ''struggling'' students be protected from further stigmatizing by the district's new ''efforts'' to help them?
Posted on September 23 at 10:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
One can tell how hard his job must have been by the level of literacy exposed in the above comments.
Posted on September 23 at 10:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
''SKIDMARK'' has base connotations as well.
Posted on September 20 at 12:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Very nice work Ms. Isenhart. Thank you.
Posted on September 19 at 12:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
who edited this piece. its s choppy as the mohawk
Posted on September 17 at 9:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
How many ''entitled'' do-overs does Hull deserve?
Posted on September 17 at 1:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
An important take away from this story's description is the ''watch group'' member seems to have acted within the confines of good citizenship, not misguided vigilantism. I have discomfort with the story's title. I'd also like to know more about police departments decision processes for ''sharing'' information with ''watch groups.''