Comments by pollywog
Posted on February 17 at 5:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I took objection to the idea that Brian Williams obviously lied to further his career. Funny, Fox News rewards its personnel for lying.
Posted on February 15 at 2:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
For Sara Foss to accuse Brian Williams of promoting his career as the justification for his misstatements is really insulting. Her reporting is no where near his ability to look at all sides of the story and lead the listener to conclusions. Brian Williams is also somewhat of a raconteur, adeptly weaving stories based on much observation. And he has been on numerous field missions over the years as well as interviewed those who have lived through such events. It might be hard to differentiate which bombing mission included the dog story or which storm led to what disaster. Even the childhood game of "telephone" will suggest how easily it is to change the content.I think Brian Williams is wise enough to know that lying is wrong and that being closer to injury does not a good newsman maketh. Someday perhaps Sara will understand, but for now I do hope she enjoys life on the pedestal she has placed herself on. If nothing else, her View should improve.
Posted on February 13 at 3:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
We were told specifically NOT to add glycol as it eats away at the pipes.
Posted on January 19 at 5:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"It's not contagious to people" is a mere seven (7) lines from the bottom.
Posted on January 4 at 2:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There are no roads or bridges named after Mario Cuomo. No hulking edifices bear his name. If you limit your search to the first page you may never know what did get done under Mario Cuomo.
You may have heard that he was a champion of the average person, and he was. Here are two things that have silently improved the lives of millions.
EPIC. Yes that little thing you rarely hear about provides assistance on a sliding scale to seniors for their prescription drugs. Another program is called EISEP for Expanded In-home Services for the Elderly Program. Those seniors eligible for Medicaid can receive in-home services to delay their need to enter a nursing home. EISEP extends those in-home, non-medical services to all elderly, again on a sliding-fee scale. Most pay nothing or little out-of-pocket. For only a few thousand dollars a year per person, this service helps seniors remain in their community when there is no family available to help with chores. It provides free, skilled case management. Since counties must pay 25% of the cost they don't often advertise its availability.
While not earth-shattering or headline-grabbing, these two simple programs make all the difference to many, many families.
Posted on November 22 at 7:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Now it will be up to the people who live on the lake to stop dumping lawn fertilizer on the slope behind their houses if they really want to return it to pristine condition.
Posted on November 22 at 6:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Drinking in the morning isn't a problem? Seriously, it's high on the list of symptoms.
Posted on November 21 at 1:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Most of the pro-Wal-Mart contingent was bussed there by their landlord, Frank Rossi. He gave them a discount ticket for dinner, too as an enticement. On the way out I heard a guy claim that Rossi just evicted him for his anti-Wal-Mart comments. Just a rumor.
Posted on November 19 at 7:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nice to see law enforcement putting their heads together and dealing with this problem. I assume it's normal for several agencies and mall rent-a-cops to be collaborating to keep our community safe. This whole thing is really a waste of time and tax-payer money. Do they routinely put so much into nabbing mall-rats or just special ones. C'mon, guys, there are better uses of your time.
Posted on November 15 at 3:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Maybe Ballston should hire a real attorney with some municipal experience to provide good legal advice. So far it looks like the town is not making good decisions since the courts seem to agree with Dolomite, not the town. Of course there are two people on the board who campaigned promising they'd stop the asphalt plant. One can only hope that they're willing to pay to suit because the town's insurance will not cover it.
Unfortunately the board listens to whatever source agrees with them, rather than someone with good legal advice.
PS all the board has to do is not give Dolomite a variance to construct the stack, which would exceed current town zoning laws. It may be too late for that.