Donald Trump gives questionable explanation of events in Ukraine

In an interview with George Stephanopoulos on the ABC News program “This Week,” Trump said that if h

Donald Trump on Sunday offered a muddled explanation of his views about the 2014 annexation of Crimea by Russia and its continued efforts to undermine Ukraine’s control of other parts of the country, and Trump amplified his earlier suggestion that, if elected president, he might recognize Russia’s claim and end sanctions against it.

In an interview with George Stephanopoulos on the ABC News program “This Week,” Trump said that if he were president, President Vladimir Putin of Russia would not send his forces into Ukraine. Trump then he backpedaled when Stephanopoulos pointed out that Russian troops had been there for nearly two years.

“He’s not going into Ukraine, OK; just so you understand,” Trump, the Republican nominee, said when the issue came up. “He’s not going to go into Ukraine, all right? You can mark it down. You can put it down. You can take it anywhere you want.”

“Well, he’s already there, isn’t he?” Stephanopoulos interrupted.

“OK, well, he’s there in a certain way,” Trump replied. “But I’m not there. You have Obama there. And frankly, that whole part of the world is a mess under Obama with all the strength that you’re talking about and all of the power of NATO and all of this. In the meantime, he’s going away. He take — takes Crimea.”

Interpreting Trump’s statements — what he understands about the current status of Ukraine, a former Soviet republic, and how it would change in a Trump administration — is difficult given the fractured nature of the exchange. But the statements were significant because Trump has seemingly embraced Putin, repeatedly called for better relations with Russia and shown an unwillingness to condemn Putin for his aggressive actions against Russia’s neighbors and its crackdowns on freedoms at home.

Questions have been raised about the watering down of a section of the Republican platform dealing with Ukraine amid evidence that wording to support sending lethal weapons to the Ukrainian government was removed from the text.

Not since 1976, when President Gerald Ford committed a major gaffe in one of his debates with Jimmy Carter, declaring that “there is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe,” has the issue of American support of Eastern European states, both those in NATO and those outside it, emerged as a major presidential campaign issue. It was enormously harmful to Ford because his statement seemed to suggest that he did not understand the geopolitics of the region, which his staff denied.

Ukraine became a separate nation in 1991 after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the breakup of the Soviet Union. Ukraine steadily flirted with the West and with NATO, and Russian officials feared Ukraine would be pulled out of Moscow’s orbit. But a pro-Russian president,

Viktor Yanukovych, was democratically elected in 2010 and remained in power until he was ousted in 2014, ultimately taking up exile in Russia.

Yanukovych had hired a lobbying firm co-founded by Paul Manafort, now Trump’s campaign manager, to improve his image in the West and avoid punishment for veering toward Russia.

The annexation of Crimea in 2014 was seen as both a power grab and a land grab by Putin. It was condemned by the United States and its European allies, which all issued sanctions. Since then, Russian troops, often out of uniform, have been seen, and sometimes killed, in Russian-speaking parts of Ukraine where a pro-Russia insurgency has fought the current Ukrainian government.

Republicans in Congress have long pressed for more assistance to Ukraine to push back against Putin, including lethal aid. But all references to giving lethal aid to the Ukrainian government were kept out of the party platform.

In early July, a delegate offered a platform amendment to support lethal aid. A delegate for U.S. Sen Ted Cruz from Texas, Diana Denman, said in an interview that she had pushed for inclusion of the language. But Denman said her amendment, as proposed, was never voted on because two men who were observing the panel’s deliberations moved to table the amendment and suggested that it be discussed later.

“They openly said they were hired by the Trump campaign and worked for Mr. Trump,” Denman said, adding that she did not recall their names. In the final version of the Republican platform, the words about weapons were dropped and replaced by the term “appropriate assistance.”

Trump acknowledged in the ABC interview that the language had been watered down, but he said he had nothing to do with it. (Manafort has also said he was unaware of the matter.)

“I wasn’t involved in that,” Trump said. “Honestly, I was not involved.” But he acknowledged that his supporters were. “They softened it, I heard, but I was not involved,” he said.

Trump went on to argue that Putin might have been welcome in Crimea, sidestepping the issue of whether the Russian leader had violated the sovereignty of another state to take the territory, where Russia has a major naval base.

“The people of Crimea, from what I’ve heard, would rather be with Russia than where they were,” Trump said. “And you have to look at that, also.”

He went on to say, “Ukraine is a mess,” but he put the blame for that on Obama, not on Putin.

Jake Sullivan, the chief policy adviser to Hillary Clinton, Trump’s Democratic opponent, said the assessment reinforced Trump’s lack of temperamental fitness for the presidency.

“Today he gamely repeated Putin’s argument that Russia was justified in seizing the sovereign territory of another country by force,” Sullivan said. “This is scary stuff. But it shouldn’t surprise us.”

Categories: News

Leave a Reply