Subscriber login

The locally owned voice of the capital region
What you need to know for 07/28/2017

Proposal for indoor rec facility in Niskayuna put on hold

Proposal for indoor rec facility in Niskayuna put on hold

A controversial proposal to build an indoor recreation facility at Niskayuna's Blatnick Park has bee

A controversial proposal to build an indoor recreation facility at Blatnick Park has been put on hold while other options are considered, Supervisor Joe Landry said today.

While some form of bonding for the facility is still an option, Landry said he has asked the town’s Parks and Community Programs Committee to study all options related to the facility.

“There may be some other financing options that we didn’t find or are now out there,” Landry said. “Things may change in the future.”

There was no timeline on an alternate proposal.

Landry said they made the move after consulting with the soccer and lacrosse clubs, who have been working on the project with the town in some form for four years.

The move was also made after realizing that the required support on the board for a bond didn’t materialize.

Of the five-member town board, four members are needed to approve a bond. Board member Jonathan McKinney has been a vocal opponent, preparing a push for a public referendum on the issue, if it were passed by the board.

Board member Liz Orzel Kasper spoke out at the most recent meeting in favor of putting the issue to a public referendum.

“I still think it’s a very good project and it’s something that’s needed in the Northeast,” Landry said.

The issue of bonding for the recreation facility has been a contentious one in the town since it was included in an upcoming proposed bonding.

Residents both for and against the project have packed recent town board meetings to voice their opinions.

Landry and board member Julie McDonnell have argued the facility is needed in the town, where indoor practice space is scarce. The town’s contributions would be covered by fees charged for using the facility. Usage fees would also cover both operating costs and debt service, they argued, with parkland funds available as a backup.

Critics argued the town couldn’t afford a facility that they said will only benefit a few. They also note the facility is being talked about after the town imposed a brush pickup fee because it could not afford to pay for the service out of general revenue.

The recreation facility was set to be part of a larger bond proposal that could hit $3 million. As much as $2 million of that is to fund a new water and sewer garage.

The recreation facility is set to cost $650,000 and be put on the site of the old skate park. Of the cost, $200,000 would be provided by the soccer and lacrosse clubs. Under the controversial proposal, the town would have contributed $100,000 from parkland funds, and $350,000 would be raised through borrowing. The clubs were also expected to kick in $56,000 in in-kind services.

The rest of the bonding it set to go forward in upcoming meetings, Landry said. A smaller portion is expected to be voted upon at Tuesday night’s meeting.

The largest portion, the money for the new water and sewer garage, is set to go forward, but not be voted upon until at least the May 17 meeting.

View Comments
Hide Comments
0 premium 1 premium 2 premium 3 premium 4 premium 5 premium 6 premium 7 premium article articles remaining SUBSCRIBE TODAY

You have reached your monthly premium content limit.

Continue to enjoy Daily Gazette premium content by becoming a subscriber.
Already a subscriber? Log In