Money intended for developmentally disabled gets wasted
In what ways are the reinstated funds for developmentally disabled services actually going to benefit the people in whose name they are intended?
I know some situations where they have greatly enhanced the lives of recipients. They provide enough supports for them to live productive, individually meaningful lives. These uses are fantastic and enhance society in general.
Unfortunately, I also know these funds end up in agency coffers, bloating budgets and staffs to the point that individual recipient needs become secondary, if not tertiary to agency and OPWDD [ Office for People with Developmental Disabilities] needs.
The March 10 article omitted reports about the feds dunning New York state to recoup past over-reimbursements. If this is a net shortfall, how will this impact reinstated funds?
The rainbow of issues that accompany these funds and services is truly mind boggling. It’s like a self-sustaining fungus; the end product devours its initial purpose. Recipients and real people get lost, shunted into inappropriate services, wasting their lives and our money.
Before just reinstating these funds, time, effort, and yes, funds should be expended to determine who is actually benefiting from them.
Don’t blame Obamacare for rising insurance costs
We are so quick to believe the propaganda of the health care industrial complex (“My insurance rate went up, it must be Obamacare”).
Of course it is difficult to prove a negative, but here goes: How fast we forget that rates have been going up for years. The health care industrial complex is now larger than the military industrial complex. Insurance companies and the health care industrial complex will say and do anything; they are the largest-spending lobby.
I know it is still difficult to see insurance rates go up, but 1) Obamacare did not go far enough — the health care industrial complex made sure of that; 2) without the modest Obamacare changes, your rates could be much higher; 3) or maybe it is a plot by the health care industrial complex to undermine Obamacare by jacking up rates before the modest changes take effect.
Time magazine had a good article about the health care industry abuses. We actually pay more but get less than any other country. The truth is hard to research, so it is much easier to believe the propaganda, but doing nothing is not an option. The health care industrial complex is going to bankrupt this country if we don’t do something. I like some of the changes of Obamacare, coverage for my minor children and pre-existing conditions, but it could have been better.
We will never see the changes that could fix the system. We should get rid of health insurance completely and go to a real free-market system. If we had to take the money out of our pockets for each procedure and see the real costs, we would control rising costs real fast.
We have come a long way from the family doctor making house calls, and not for the better.
Political aspirations drove Cuomo push for gun law
Re March 1 letter, “Assault weapon ban the very least we can do”: Virginia Newton manifests her ignorance of the intent of the SAFE Act and the manner in which it was enacted.
First, as any gun owner knows, the SAFE Act is an attempt to erode or eradicate the Second Amendment rights guaranteed by the Constitution. I suggest Ms. Newton read the Constitution before she attempts to interpret it. What part of “shall not be infringed” does she fail to comprehend?
Second, the SAFE Act was rammed through the Legislature by a governor who has designs on the presidency. He saw a political opportunity and chose to capitalize on a tragedy to gain additional media attention and garner more headlines for himself. Little or no opposition was brooked, and there was precious little, if any, debate permitted.
If proper procedures were followed, “the need for adjustment and tweaking in order to best serve the population of New York state” would not have been required because a proper law would have been enacted, rather than the edict issued by Gov. Cuomo.
I compliment Gov. Cuomo on both the swift passage and concepts of the SAFE Act; Hitler and his Reichstag could not have done it any better or faster. As for myself, I refuse to sacrifice my Second Amendment rights on the altar of Andrew Cuomo’s attempt to be president.
Michael G. Decker
A progressive pair to lead Victory forward
For the voters of Victory, this year’s election will include a vote for dissolution, as well as for mayor and trustee seats. While dissolution is the right and positive forward-thinking action that should be taken, it is important to choose the right leaders, no matter which way the dissolution vote goes.
After meeting with Mick Salls and Patti-Jolie-Zotzman, we know who we will choose March 19. Both candidates are best fit to represent the members of our great community. Patti and Mick have the right leadership skills needed to move forward in either direction. They have laid out a positive vision for the village if the voters choose not to dissolve. They offer a plan to start working on a solid sidewalk replacement program. They also see a benefit from returning to a more positive discussion between the villages of Schuylerville and Victory concerning shared services.
Patti and Mick realize that we must invest in our infrastructure and want to help by continuing to pave one road a year in the village. If the voters decide to dissolve the village, their experience as former mayors provide them with the skills necessary to work with officials at the town level, to ensure a smooth transition.
What have we heard from the other candidates? More promises of the same dysfunctional government that has no forward-moving vision. No talk about improving the dialogue with the village of Schuylerville’s elected officials.
This contentious relationship cannot be beneficial to the taxpayers of either village, and yet we have seen nothing over the last four years that shows either incumbent is ready to embrace a different course of action.
We need to be informed voters. This is why we will be supporting Mick Salls and Patti Jolie-Zotzman on March 19.
Patricia and Harvey Howd
The Y is a gym, so don’t run it like a jail
Recently a few of my high school classmates and I went to the new YMCA in downtown Schenectady to play basketball. The place was packed. People where all over the lobby, new members coming to join, and tons of individuals working out, showing that the new Y is doing great.
On the other hand, when we approached to play basketball and paid our $10 for a day pass, we where told to stand and wait while background checks where run on us. I have gone to this YMCA and others recently, same situation, and never once had a background check run on myself or my friends.
We totally understood the idea behind them, and why the YMCA was doing them, but running background checks on individuals to play basketball and lift weights, especially in front of an open area (lobby) with other people around, is not right.
As the employee ran the checks, I could, as clear as day, read his computer monitor, which was less then five feet from where everyone in the lobby was conducting their business. We as a group felt as if we where entering into a maximum security facility of some sort, the way we were treated.
If Hispanics want vote, they can learn English
Re March 6 editorial, “Montgomery County’s Hispanic voters deserve as much”: Let me begin saying I have nothing against Puerto Ricans or any other ethnic group. But I believe all people should take responsibility for learning to speak English.
Mr. [Attorney General Eric] Schneiderman wants all voting literature to be in Spanish as well as English. Does this mean he eventually will want to do this, at taxpayers’ expense, for other groups that do not speak English?
Years ago, when our grandparents came to this country, one of the prerequisites was, and still is, you had to learn English. They learned with help from family members and friends, who also were their translators.
Doe the attorney general want us to pay for translators, too?
Am I to assume all counties are in agreement with his orders? If so, then it’s all about the vote and to hell with the taxpayers.
The Gazette wants your opinions on public issues.
There is no strict word limit, though letters under 200 words are preferred.
All letters are subject to editing for length, style and fairness, and we will run no more than one letter per month from the same writer.
Please include your signature, address and day phone for verification.
For information on how to send, see bottom of this page.
For more letters, visit our Web site: www.dailygazette.com.