Subscriber login

Letters to the Editor
What you need to know for 01/16/2018

Magid’s reading plan could work wonders for Schenectady, worth a try

Magid’s reading plan could work wonders for Schenectady, worth a try

*Magid’s reading plan could work wonders for Sch’dy, worth a try *Old enough to fight; why not old e

Magid’s reading plan could work wonders for Sch’dy, worth a try

Reading Moses Brand’s April 26 letter (“Teaching 4-year-olds to read a great idea; Magid’s plan is not”), I found myself alternating between anger and disbelief.

Brand asserts that Al Magid’s plan for a comprehensive volunteer reading program, focused on Schenectady’s 4-year-olds, is “totally unrealistic” because some parents will not welcome a volunteer into their home or attend meetings, while others are simply “on overload ... and school readiness is just not on their radar.”

He further states that Magid’s plan might have worked “in an era long past ... when parents had the time and motivation to participate in reading-related activities with their children.”

How could a school psychologist, whose mission is to encourage and guide students through myriad adolescent emotional, personal and family problems, possibly have such a completely negative, stunningly hopeless attitude? It’s one thing to see the glass as only half full, it’s quite another to not even see the glass.

My feeling is that Magid’s volunteer reading proposal, and his personal commitment, is ground-breaking and heroic. With community support and backing, it could be life-changing for many children. He has tackled head-on the single most formidable — and avoided — problem causing student failure today, i.e., the lack of inner-city parental involvement.

Granted, no program can magically transform the inner-city culture of crime, drugs and parental neglect. But Magid’s proposal has wonderful possibilities; it could drastically change the lives of some children and give hope to their parents. I believe some parents may respond beautifully to a little assistance, a gentle push and some real encouragement by caring volunteers, who might just breathe fresh life into households trapped in the hopelessness expressed by Mr. Brand. How refreshing!

Vince Dacquisto


The writer is a retired teacher.

Old enough to fight; why not old enough to drink?

Your April 24 editorial, Sobering truth behind underage booze sting,” seemed to omit some important details about the lives of young Americans.

People between 18 and 20 years old are eligible to vote. They can sign up for military duty and serve in war zones. Many are eager to start college or careers. In short, every person in that age group is legally an adult — they are not “kids,” as the editorial stated.

They are soldiers who could possibly lose limbs or die for this country; but by law, they cannot return home to relax over drinks in bars and restaurants. They’re smart people who go to college to be free of parental rules; and that often involves consuming large amounts of beer, wine or liquor with their new friends on campus.

Sure, young adults are prone to abuse alcohol and drive drunk. But the same goes for just as many, if not more, older people.

Also, while the store clerks reportedly sold alcohol to “underage buyers” (who worked for the police), these were nothing but victimless crimes. Now, the 12 adults arrested in the sting may suffer through months of unemployment and legal problems.

The story left me wondering if our current underage laws should be repealed, like Prohibition itself.



Politicians dancing to the gun manufacturers’ tune

Shame on those who claim [politicians] want our support during elections. Those who favor gun regulations outnumber those who do not. The excuses from legislators are pathetic.

I wonder how those same [legislators] would feel if there were no regulations for automobiles and drivers? They feed on fear to support greed.

The gun manufacturers love it. They are the ones who are afraid. They fear discussions might call for regulations that would limit profits.

Lois M. Dodge


Pols play fast and loose with taxpayers’ money

Re April 21 article, “Pedestrian bridge envisioned as park over Mohawk”: $16.5 million for a bridge to where? $85 million for the rehab of a football stadium [April 7 Gazette]?

Will we ever stop electing idiots to public office?

Fred Maurer

Burnt Hills

Letters Policy

The Gazette wants your opinions on public issues.

There is no strict word limit, though letters under 200 words are preferred.

All letters are subject to editing for length, style and fairness, and we will run no more than one letter per month from the same writer.

Please include your signature, address and day phone for verification.

For information on how to send, see bottom of this page.

For more letters, visit our Web site:

View Comments
Hide Comments
0 premium 1 premium 2 premium 3 premium 4 premium 5 premium article articles remaining SUBSCRIBE TODAY

You have reached your monthly premium content limit.

Continue to enjoy Daily Gazette premium content by becoming a subscriber.
Already a subscriber? Log In